tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25629438.post4511647693475199275..comments2023-10-10T03:03:20.347-07:00Comments on { nikuko } alan sondheim { jennifer }: alanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04501438991069618087noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25629438.post-66017459004840886682007-06-24T03:10:00.000-07:002007-06-24T03:10:00.000-07:00Cheers Alan - I'll - wait for it! -google Alfred S...Cheers Alan - I'll - wait for it! -google Alfred Schutz - phenomenology (or the idea of it) intrigues me - I did read some Heiddeger (who I thought at first was compleletly wrong...and also wasn't happy to hear that he had been a Nazi) and (more recently) bits of Derrida and Husserl is courtesy of the Philosophy Encyc on the internet as I get bogged down in the texts - but I liked (like) reading Barthes...and some of Foucault - will revist it him... (I did some philosophy Uni but we kind of avoided the main texts eg for Camus I read 'The Outsider' and read some stories etc of Sartre for Sartre; and some excerpts of Heidegger and Foucault - but I recall that that year's study was exciting (there were 2 visiting philosophy Professors from the US) - I really enjoyed Satres "Nausea". Regards. <BR/><BR/>Phenomenology as far as I think I understand it - appeals to me..and science - an interesting combination...(just reading M-Ponty -or an abstract on him - and I keep coming (or trying to come) to him from a "scientific angle" - can see his ideas could connect into other - many other philosophers.<BR/><BR/>I read some editions of Scientifc American - the recent one on Time was great..particle phsyics is always fascinating but one needs the maths but the maths becomes nearly impossible - but then maths at a certain limit becomes philosophy or language (symbolic language).Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10272507198753290435noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25629438.post-3227878896044933692007-06-21T23:42:00.000-07:002007-06-21T23:42:00.000-07:00I really like Merleau-Ponty - I read him years ago...I really like Merleau-Ponty - I read him years ago, and Alfred Schutz at the same time; phenomenology really hit home - both senses of the word, philosophy but also science, i.e. phenomenology of particle physics - an exact all-encompassing description -sondheimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13620342295244407060noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25629438.post-79528819276473040892007-06-21T02:36:00.000-07:002007-06-21T02:36:00.000-07:00This is good - it helps I am reading (about) Merle...This is good - it helps I am reading (about) Merleau-Ponty - just now - but this can be read alone - I like the "change' in the second para...the "logic" doesn't have to "follow" - it works sans logic as such I feel - although that also adds to it...the philos. etc <BR/><BR/>I started the (my) 'Sondheim Project' by putting up two "advertisments" for you and your "project" as I call it on My Space and my Blog...<BR/><BR/>I gave links to this Blog and your other site on EYELIGHT and on My Space. <BR/><BR/>Cheers. RichardRichardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10272507198753290435noreply@blogger.com